South Alabama
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
702  Warno Potgieter FR 33:13
962  Migael Heine Strydom FR 33:35
1,318  Luke Fielding SO 34:05
1,594  Ben Rolader SO 34:27
1,866  Dylan Pausic SO 34:53
1,898  Nate Pudner FR 34:56
2,131  John Rumore FR 35:23
2,168  Phillip Friendlander SR 35:28
2,846  Graylon Cross SO 38:34
National Rank #190 of 315
South Region Rank #20 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 68.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Warno Potgieter Migael Heine Strydom Luke Fielding Ben Rolader Dylan Pausic Nate Pudner John Rumore Phillip Friendlander Graylon Cross
Louisville Classic (Blue) 09/30 1180 33:12 33:54 33:28 34:17 35:03 35:08 35:32
Crimson Classic 10/13 1177 33:01 33:39 34:14 34:36 35:02 34:42 36:12 35:23 38:35
Sun Belt Championship 10/28 1158 33:07 33:14 34:06 34:11 34:35 35:16 36:19
South Region Championships 11/10 1211 33:37 33:33 34:07 34:58 35:01 35:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.4 551 0.4 1.8 6.9 11.9 13.8 16.9 16.5 14.4 8.7 6.1 2.3 0.5 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Warno Potgieter 59.5
Migael Heine Strydom 84.9
Luke Fielding 114.8
Ben Rolader 133.9
Dylan Pausic 153.6
Nate Pudner 155.9
John Rumore 172.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.4% 0.4 14
15 1.8% 1.8 15
16 6.9% 6.9 16
17 11.9% 11.9 17
18 13.8% 13.8 18
19 16.9% 16.9 19
20 16.5% 16.5 20
21 14.4% 14.4 21
22 8.7% 8.7 22
23 6.1% 6.1 23
24 2.3% 2.3 24
25 0.5% 0.5 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0